Probate, Trust & Guardianship Litigation Blog

By: Glenn M. Mednick, Esquire

 

4th DCA Reverses Order Appointing Guardian Advocates for Ward Because it did not Comply with Specific Requirements of § 393.12(8), Fla. Stat.

Posted on June 12, 2016

In the subject case, Howard v. Howard, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7978 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2016), the father, mother, and brother (collectively “Appellees”) of Katherine Howard (the “ward” and “Appellant”) petitioned the trial court to declare the ward incapacitated and appoint themselves guardian advocates of the ward. Appellees stated in their petition that the ward suffered from spastic quadriplegia (a severe form of cerebral palsy), anxiety, and depression and sought to remove the ward's right to personally apply for government benefits, to have...

Read More

 

4th DCA Holds That § 768.79, Fla. Stat. May Be Limited in its Applicability Where “True Relief” Sought is Nonmonetary

Posted on June 10, 2016

In the subject case, MYD Marine Distrib. v. Int'l Paint, Ltd., 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), a business lawsuit appeal, in which there were allegations of conspiracy, breach of contract, and price fixing, monetary damages as well as nonmonetary damages were sought. The Court noted that section 768.79(1) explicitly applies only to civil actions for damages. Accordingly, an offer of judgment which purports to resolve all claims is invalid if the case includes both monetary and nonmonetary causes of action. Diamond Aircraft Indus.,...

Read More

 

3rd DCA Takes Opportunity to Emphasize that on Appeal, “LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE” is not a Reference to a Florida Sunrise

Posted on May 30, 2016

In the subject case, Hall v. Hall, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6352 (Fla. 3d DCA, 2016), the Third DCA began its opinion in jest, stating, “The ‘light most favorable’ is not a reference to a Florida sunrise.” It went on to point out that appellants are obligated to provide a statement of facts and to interpret the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conclusions of fact, citing its longstanding precedent, Turner v. Lorber, 360 So. 2d 101, 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). 

In the...

Read More

 

3rd DCA Finds Trial Court Erred In Holding That a Notice to Creditors was a Nullity for Having Been Published on Day Before Entry of Order Appointing Personal Representatives

Posted on May 27, 2016

In Richard v. Richard, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6747 (Fla. 3d DCA, 2016), Edward Richard (“Decedent") passed away in 2012. Subsequently, his surviving spouse, Karen, and his son, Joel, filed a petition for testate administration, seeking to be appointed co-personal representatives of the estate. Their petition was granted, the applicable will and codicil were admitted to probate, and the letters of administration were signed. However, one day prior to the court's order appointing them as co-personal representatives, but nearly a month after they...

Read More

 

4th DCA Finds Trial Court Misapplies Both Res Judicata & Laches in Granting Summary Judgment

Posted on May 16, 2016

In Woodward v. Woodward, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2016), the Fourth DCA found that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of a trustee on the beneficiary's breach of fiduciary duty claim where neither res judicata nor laches barred the action. The action arose from a new and different breach of fiduciary duty and suit was filed within six months of trust accounting, as required under Section 736.1008(2), Fla. Stat.

In the subject case, Mary Woodward established a trust...

Read More

 

3rd DCA Upholds Claim of PR Under §689.07(1), Fla. Stat. Where Alleged Deed Named No Beneficiaries, Trust Name, Date, or Purpose & Trust was not Recorded

Posted on May 8, 2016

In Giller v. Giller, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6355 (Fla. 3d DCA, 2016), Personal Representatives, Ira and Anita Grossman (“Appellants”), of the estate of Norman Giller (“Decedent”), filed a Complaint for declaratory relief in probate court against Brian Geller et al. (“Appellees”) after learning of six parcels of real property titled in the Decedent’s name as trustee. Appellants noted that the parcels were owned by Decedent in fee simple and that the properties became assets of the estate after his death, thus should have been part of the estate...

Read More

 

New Law Governing Personal Representatives’ Access to Digital Data to Go Into Effect July 2016: Florida Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act

Posted on May 1, 2016

Florida Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act will affect how personal representatives access digital data in Florida. It was recently passed as Senate Bill No. 494 and will be going into effect July 1, 2016.

As stated on Florida’s Senate website, the new law accomplishes two things. First, it gives fiduciaries the legal authority to manage digital assets and electronic communications in the same way that they manage tangible assets and accounts. It distinguishes between when a fiduciary may access the content...

Read More

 

New Law Governing Personal Representatives’ Access to Digital Data to Go Into Effect July 2016: Florida Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act

Florida Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act will affect how personal representatives access digital data in Florida. It was recently passed as Senate Bill No. 494 and will be going into effect July 1, 2016.

As stated on Florida’s Senate website, the new law accomplishes two things. First, it gives fiduciaries the legal authority to manage digital assets and electronic communications in the same way that they manage tangible assets and accounts. It distinguishes between when a fiduciary may access the content...

Read More

 

2nd DCA Finds the Trial Court Erred in not Considering Trust Articles in their Entirety

Posted on April 24, 2016

In Vigliani v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3522 (Fla. 2d DCA, 2016), the Second DCA found that the trial court erred in not considering trust articles in their entirety. The children and grandchildren (“Appellants”) were the beneficiaries of the family trust (“Family Trust”) of Mario Vigliani’s, (“Decedent” and “Settlor”). When the lawsuit was filed in the trial court, Maryann Vigliani, wife of Decedent, was a co-trustee along with the Appellee, Bank of America, N.A. Mrs. Vigliani died following the oral argument in the case,...

Read More

 

2nd DCA Finds the Trial Court Erred in not Considering Trust Articles in their Entirety

In Vigliani v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3522 (Fla. 2d DCA, 2016), the Second DCA found that the trial court erred in not considering trust articles in their entirety. The children and grandchildren (“Appellants”) were the beneficiaries of the family trust (“Family Trust”) of Mario Vigliani’s, (“Decedent” and “Settlor”). When the lawsuit was filed in the trial court, Maryann Vigliani, wife of Decedent, was a co-trustee along with the Appellee, Bank of America, N.A. Mrs. Vigliani died following the oral argument in the case,...

Read More

 

Blog Archive

Practice Areas

Probate Administration & Litigation

Wills & Trust Administration & Litigation

Guardianship Administration & Litigation

Commercial & Real Estate

Contracts

Mediation

Contact Us

Name*

Email*

Phone*

Message

SPAM validation

Mednick Law Ground Logo

Serving clients in Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Deerfield Beach, West Palm Beach and throughout the Tri-County Area of Palm Beach County, Broward County and Miami-Dade County.

Mednick Law Ground Linkedin Mednick Law Ground Facebook Mednick Law Ground Twitter Mednick Law Ground Youtube Mednick Law Ground Instagram

Contact

12856 Whitehorn Way
Boynton Beach, Florida 33473-3313

Phone: (561) 614-2770
Click Here For Directions

Practice Areas

Probate
Wills & Trust
Guardianship
Commercial & Real Estate Litigation
Negotiation of Contracts
Mediation

Quick Links

Attorney Profile
FAQ Videos
Blog
Resources
Contact
Disclaimer